Voter Guide

1A - I voted No because it restricts gas taxes to only be used for transportation funding, and that seems like a good idea, until there is a recession and all kinds of social programs have to get cut back because they cannot use any gas tax moneys.
1B - I voted No on this because I believe that there is too much emphasis on improving infastructure for automobiles and not enough to encourage other types of transportation.
1C - Houseing for lower income people seems like a good idea. Especially because most of the development would go into under-used city lots near buses and bart (in the bay area). This is a more sustainable way of developing.
1D - I voted yes because it give money to all public education for infastructure improvements. Living on a UC campus I know that there can never really be enough money in this department. I also believe that investment in the education of Californians will eventually help California's economy.
1E - I voted Yes because in the shadow of Katrina and all the recent flooding in California it makes sense to be a bit more prepared.
83 - Monotoring people with gps locators, even if they are sexual predators, seems to go against basic American values. It also is a little bit too George Orwell for me. Each GPS device will also cost a pretty penny. Vote no.
84 - This proposition give clean water to several towns in the Central Valley and money to parks. It also gives money to found natural history museums and aquariums focusing on conservation. The parks in Northern California could use some improvement and more staff and encouraging conservation is always good. Vote yes.
85 - Being a young person I don't really believe in forcing young people to tell their parents, even if they are abusive, that they are getting an abortion. Notifying the parents could result in hesitation of the girl or abuse after she gets the procedure.


................... the rest will come

If you have opinions or questions about the guide I have made I would love to hear them. Later.